Which unpopular form of expression is protected by the First Amendment?

The First Amendment of the United States Constitution protects various forms of expression, including those that are unpopular or controversial. Flag burning is a notable example of such expression that is protected under the First Amendment. This protection stems from the recognition that free speech includes not only popular ideas but also those that provoke strong reactions and dissent.

The Supreme Court has ruled that burning the flag constitutes symbolic speech, which falls under the broader category of free expression. This protection emphasizes the importance of allowing individuals to express their views, even when those views may be offensive or disagreeable to the majority. The ruling underlines the principle that the government cannot restrict speech simply because it is unpopular or distasteful.

In contrast, other forms of expression mentioned in the options—libel, slander, and obscenity—do not receive the same level of protection. Libel and slander, which involve false statements that harm someone's reputation, can lead to lawsuits and are not protected under the First Amendment. Obscenity, too, is not protected, as it lacks any redeeming social value and is subject to regulation based on community standards. Therefore, flag burning stands out as a significant example of unpopular expression that is explicitly protected, reinforcing the concept of robust free speech in a democratic